- The Productive Disruptive
- Posts
- Harmful "Heroes"
Harmful "Heroes"
Every Tuesday, The Productive Disruptive delivers storytelling science, message makeovers, cultural commentary, and a little rebellious hope for anyone still stubborn enough to believe communication can change the world.
Did a wise PHriend forward this to you? [Subscribe here.]

Why Savior Stories Keep Failing Us…
There’s a story shape we love so much we barely notice when it slips into our thinking.
Trust me, you know the one.
One gifted person rises from struggle, beats impossible odds, survives the trials, gets the crown, and comes back transformed.
It’s the Hero’s Journey, and Hollywood’s been milking that baby for years.
It is one of the most recognizable storytelling frameworks we’ve got, and for individual growth, it works.
The problem starts when we drag that same frame into places it was never built to hold: systems change, collective struggle, public health, movement work, community healing.
The white paper I’ve been sitting with puts it plainly: the Hero’s Journey is powerful for individual transformation, but it becomes a poor fit for collective problems, where no single person can resolve the challenge alone.
And when that mismatch happens, the story doesn’t just get a little sloppy. It can get dangerous.
Why?
Because a hero’s journey can make inequality look like inspiration.
It can train us to think progress looks like one exceptional person escaping the trap, instead of asking why the trap is still there for everybody else.
It can make us overvalue charisma, individual ascent, and symbolic wins while undervaluing coalitions, infrastructure, shared labor, and the conditions that let communities thrive.
The white paper warns that hero-centered framings can feed savior complexes in leadership and passivity in communities, because they imply the answer rests with a singular figure rather than a group.
To me, one of the clearest examples of this in real time is Jay-Z.
Marcy Projects to mogul.
Drug dealing to boardrooms.
Rejection to empire.
Textbook hero arc.
GQ’s recent profile leans all the way into that scale, framing him as a self-made billionaire and central cultural force.
In the interview, Jay-Z pushes back on criticism of capitalism, saying people use the word “capitalist” like a slur, and argues that he did not get where he is by exploiting loopholes but by dealing with the world “the way it is.”
He also says that sometimes progress looks like starting your own company, and sometimes it looks like partnering with established companies because Black people do not control distribution or media at scale.
See what I’m saying, here?
Meteroic, one in a million rags to riches story. He did what he did and got where he got.
And that story is compelling enough to distract people from a harder question:
Did the group rise too?
Because that’s the part hero stories are often bad at.
They can tell us how one person made it out.
They are far less equipped to tell us whether the neighborhood got freer.
Whether the workers got protected.
Whether the people got more resourced.
Whether the system changed, or whether we just crowned somebody who learned how to move really well inside it.
A compelling success story can make us confuse individual breakthrough with collective progress.
The problem is when we use a story built for one person to explain the kind of change that takes groups, policy, advocacy, and sustained collective effort.
That doesn’t mean the Hero’s Journey is trash. It’s been extensively studied and put through the fire.
It just means it has its own lane.
It can be a powerful tool for writing about personal growth, courage, and transformation.
But if you’re trying to tell the story of public health, justice, liberation, or systems change, consider a wider lens.
One that asks not just who made it out, but what changed for everybody else.
One that pays attention to coalitions, conditions, and community, not just charm and charisma.
One that knows a powerful protagonist is not the same thing as progress.
Because sometimes the most revealing question a story can raise is not, “Who won?”
It’s, “Who else benefited?”
🧠 Story Science Side Note: A story can feel crystal clear and still teach the wrong lesson. Research suggests that coherent narratives are easier to remember and mentally organize than disconnected ones. In one study, people recalled more information from events that formed a coherent narrative than from events that did not, supporting the idea that narratives provide a “high-level architecture” for memory. So when a story gives us one hero, one struggle, and one payoff, it can feel complete even when it leaves out systems, relationships, and collective effort.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13421-021-01178-x
📝 Message Makeover:
Before: He changed the game.
After: He may have changed his position in the game. That doesn’t mean the rules changed for everybody else.
I’m a fan of Jay Z’s music, but sheesh. I am not a fan of his any longer lol. Can you blame me?
🛠️ The PHacilitator’s Corner:
Try a Hero Audit this week.
Real or fictional, what’s a story you admire?
Then ask,
Who is centered as the hero here?
Who helped make this outcome possible?
What conditions made this success easier or harder?
What changed for the wider group, not just the individual?
Is this a story of personal success, or collective progress?
Just something to grapple with.
Patiently waiting for actual Spring weather